Hi, RAZD.
RAZD writes:
And some of them gained wings (red). And diversified.
And some of them lost wings (blue again). And diversified.
And one of those gained wings again (Lapaphus parakensis, below, red again).
Actually, you've said this backwards: red is wingless and blue is winged.
So, you've got a wingless common ancestor of walking sticks, several different lineages of walking sticks regaining their wings, and one of those from a winged clade losing its wings again.
Just a clarification note: the numbers provided at each fork in the tree are bootstrap values. A bootstrap value of 100 means that all simulations run agreed at that point.
So, there is pretty unequivocal support for the wingless
Lopaphus parakensis being derived from within the winged clade.
Edited by Bluejay, : Added picture link for clarification
-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.