doc writes:
Language "evolution" and the evolution of living things is not the same and it's not really a valid comparison.
I was trying to use language as an analogy. Languages do accumulate changes in an analogous manner to genomes. These language changes occur at the population level, much like evolution. We also see languages diverging, again very much like biological lineages. There are many parallels which makes the evolution of languages a good analogy (but an analogy only).
As I said before, none of the Romance languages are evolving in reverse. None are sounding more and more like Latin. In the same way, genomes do not evolve so that the sequence of DNA becomes more and more like it's ancestors. There is not a DNA memory that forces genomes to move towards a specific DNA sequence in response to an external stimulus. In the same way, there is nothing forcing Italian and French to move towards Latin.
Selection occurs at the phenotypic level, not at the genomic level. That is the lesson to learn here. Natural selection affects the results of DNA alteration, but it does not select for specific DNA changes. Also, natural selection is not searching for a specific solution. Natural selection is searching for higher fitness, no matter how it is achieved.