Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,803 Year: 4,060/9,624 Month: 931/974 Week: 258/286 Day: 19/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are we living on the planet of the apes?
Jagz Beach
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 79 (77819)
01-11-2004 3:54 PM


Which modern day science are you refering to because I can assure you that they are fumbling the ball.But do not take my word for it. Allow myself and others here to present the errors and show how it is actually easy for you to understand it also. SCience is not hard but it requires you to look at a tough problem from a fresh point of view.Please let us help you to understand.
Please help me as you can see I need a lot of help~!!
How do we go from here...
"All processes (left to themselves) go toward a greater state of disorder, disorganization, disarrangement and less complexity.".
To a "simple cell" transforming through a natural process into a man when it is not programmed to do so?
[This message has been edited by Jagz Beach, 01-11-2004]

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by sidelined, posted 01-11-2004 4:41 PM Jagz Beach has not replied
 Message 64 by RRoman, posted 01-11-2004 4:50 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 62 of 79 (77828)
01-11-2004 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 3:46 PM


is modern day science that is debunking evolution.
You mean the modern science that's discovering unprecidented new trasnitional fossils? The modern science that's uncovering the genetic evidence that links all species? The modern science that allows us to use evolutionary processes to design circuit boards and jet airplanes?
That modern science? Oh, I see, you meant a 2000-year-old book. That doesn't sound modern to me.
ever hear of entropy?
You mean, a decrease in energy available to do work? What does that have to do with evolution? Yeah, I've heard of entropy. Obviously you don't really know what it is.
Trying to give credit to evolution for science is an absurdity.
No. What's absurd is trying to hold a 2000-year-old fairy tale over the most influential theory in biology. Your ignorance of the history of science is noted. You still haven't explained how the fact that you have less training, less education, less experience, and most importantly less data than biologists allows you to tell them what's what.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 3:46 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 63 of 79 (77830)
01-11-2004 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 3:54 PM


Jagz
Ok let us start with this.
"All processes (left to themselves) go toward a greater state of disorder, disorganization, disarrangement and less complexity.".
I am going to give you access to web pages one at a time in order to slowly acquaint you with how the concepts behind your question work.
First off we must understand the concept of energy.Check out this website,just right click your mouse while holding the cursor over it.
http://www.explorepdx.com/abstract01.html
I will get back to you over the next little while and we will gradually introduce you to the other parts of the puzzle. For the moment however my child needs me time and She is quite persuasive.

"I am not young enough to know everything. "
Oscar Wilde

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 3:54 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
RRoman
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 79 (77832)
01-11-2004 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 3:54 PM


quote:
All processes (left to themselves) go toward a greater state of disorder, disorganization, disarrangement and less complexity.

"Knowledge is Power" - Francis Bacon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 3:54 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by NosyNed, posted 01-11-2004 5:37 PM RRoman has not replied

  
Jagz Beach
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 79 (77843)
01-11-2004 5:37 PM


DNA code to me is basically software program that ties virtually everything together in the Matrix of this God forsaken planet, heredity factors in this software program is what separates us from apes dogs cats yadda yadda. Don't send me to any stinking links. Give it to me in a sentence a paragragh or whatever. Do you guys want to help, or make me feel dumber than I was before I got here? I already know I am an idiot... you don't have to remind me. Enough, with all the ridiculous syllables, just answer the god damn question at the top of the page.

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by sidelined, posted 01-11-2004 6:25 PM Jagz Beach has not replied
 Message 68 by Chiroptera, posted 01-11-2004 8:01 PM Jagz Beach has not replied
 Message 69 by Wounded King, posted 01-12-2004 5:01 AM Jagz Beach has not replied
 Message 76 by Loudmouth, posted 01-12-2004 4:57 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 66 of 79 (77844)
01-11-2004 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by RRoman
01-11-2004 4:50 PM


well done
Excellent first post!!! Nice style

Common sense isn't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by RRoman, posted 01-11-2004 4:50 PM RRoman has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 67 of 79 (77849)
01-11-2004 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 5:37 PM


Jagz
Whoa up my friend.It is not possible to explain the whole of everything that you need in order to understand how nature does what she does.By your own admission
Please help me as you can see I need a lot of help~!!
How do we go from here...
I do sincerely want to help. But this is not a matter of faith. You are required to invest some effort into thinking about these principles that underlie the processes you are so keen to know about.
Without going over the physics behind these things you cannot know if what I am telling you holds water or not.
I will leave it up to you.

"I am not young enough to know everything. "
Oscar Wilde

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 5:37 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 79 (77866)
01-11-2004 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 5:37 PM


I apologize if my last post seem unreasonably harsh. It's hard to tell sometimes when someone is having some difficulty in understanding or whether they are intentionally being difficult.
To reply to your earlier post: the second law of thermodynamics makes no mention of complexity or order. Here is the second law of thermodynamics as taught in an upper level college physics course:
It is not possible to create a process whose sole result is the extraction of heat energy from a single reservoir and converting it into work.
See, no mention of order or complexity. The statement that you have made is a simplified version of the second law that is not entirely accurate.
By the way, for those interested, here is gallo's Thermodynamics Test. In it are two other statements of the second law that are exactly equivalent to the one that I just gave. Can you find them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 5:37 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 69 of 79 (77920)
01-12-2004 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 5:37 PM


Dear Jagz,
I think the fundamental problem with the
All processes (left to themselves) go toward a greater state of disorder, disorganization, disarrangement and less complexity.
quote is the bit about "left to themselves". None of the proceses of life or living organisms on this planet are left to themselves, they all interact with their environment.
In thermodynamic terms there are no living systems on Earth which are closed system they all have energy input from outside mostly from the sun, directly or indirectly.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 5:37 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 70 of 79 (77961)
01-12-2004 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by NosyNed
01-10-2004 8:55 PM


Re: One point you missed
quote:
Your discussion of the appearance of VCR's misses one important point. VCR's don't f**k! When you figure out why that is important get back to us.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
Beautiful in it's simplicity and brevity, Ned, truly a thing of beauty.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by NosyNed, posted 01-10-2004 8:55 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Wounded King, posted 01-12-2004 9:38 AM nator has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 71 of 79 (77963)
01-12-2004 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by nator
01-12-2004 9:36 AM


I don't know, my VCR seems to be f**ked whenever there's something I really want to record on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by nator, posted 01-12-2004 9:36 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by nator, posted 01-12-2004 9:50 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 72 of 79 (77970)
01-12-2004 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by Wounded King
01-12-2004 9:38 AM


Yeah, well nobody saw it get f**ked, so nobody really can say if it happened or not!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Wounded King, posted 01-12-2004 9:38 AM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by mike the wiz, posted 01-12-2004 10:08 AM nator has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 73 of 79 (77978)
01-12-2004 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by nator
01-12-2004 9:50 AM


Mine got jammed, so it didn't record the event.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by nator, posted 01-12-2004 9:50 AM nator has not replied

  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 79 (77982)
01-12-2004 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Jagz Beach
01-11-2004 3:30 PM


I am not that complicated
So it wasn't that difficult for you to evolve then...
DT

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Jagz Beach, posted 01-11-2004 3:30 PM Jagz Beach has not replied

  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 79 (77985)
01-12-2004 10:30 AM


Hey Jagz, I like your avatar (a jaguar, Panthera onca, presumably). Could you perhaps tell me what 'kind' it is, please? I assume you believe that 'kinds' are immutable -- that a human couldn't be derived by descent from an ape, an amphibian from a fish, a bird from a dinosaur, and so on. Perhaps you could tell us what a 'kind' actually is?
Cheers, DT

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024