Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,796 Year: 4,053/9,624 Month: 924/974 Week: 251/286 Day: 12/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ring species as evidence for speciation
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 53 (113495)
06-08-2004 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by arachnophilia
06-07-2004 11:40 PM


They are so afraid of not being "saved" that really that is what their life revolves around. If Satan is tempting them every step of the way, then it is also easy to presume that Evolution is just a devilishly large ploy to lead them astray, and thus lose out on salvation.
Now, we are many other Christians who know that this is nonsense, and that we have our brain and senses so we can use them. The others are pretty much a lost cause, as far as I see them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by arachnophilia, posted 06-07-2004 11:40 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 06-09-2004 1:52 AM Steen has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 195 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 17 of 53 (113572)
06-08-2004 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Steen
06-07-2004 11:08 PM


What happened to JonF?
Still here, don't have anything to say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Steen, posted 06-07-2004 11:08 PM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Steen, posted 06-08-2004 10:32 PM JonF has replied

  
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 53 (113706)
06-08-2004 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by JonF
06-08-2004 9:43 AM


You are the one who provided the most in-depth comment to the issue of the ring species. I would love more comments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by JonF, posted 06-08-2004 9:43 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by JonF, posted 06-09-2004 10:17 AM Steen has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1370 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 19 of 53 (113733)
06-09-2004 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Steen
06-08-2004 1:32 AM


They are so afraid of not being "saved" that really that is what their life revolves around. If Satan is tempting them every step of the way, then it is also easy to presume that Evolution is just a devilishly large ploy to lead them astray, and thus lose out on salvation.
well, the really sad part is that, in my opinion, there is so much more to christianity. people who get caught up in the absolute need for the literalness and inerrency of the bible miss so much.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Steen, posted 06-08-2004 1:32 AM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Steen, posted 06-10-2004 12:26 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 195 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 20 of 53 (113850)
06-09-2004 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Steen
06-08-2004 10:32 PM


Sorry, I have no comments to make. I'm no expert, just happened to be aware of the recent paper and posted a link to it. From your posts I presume you know a lot more about the genetics and techniques than I do. Physics and geology are more my things.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Steen, posted 06-08-2004 10:32 PM Steen has not replied

  
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 53 (114043)
06-10-2004 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by arachnophilia
06-09-2004 1:52 AM


That is what is so pathetic about creationists, this insecurity. Faith simply isn't enough for them, they need this concrete "evidence" so desperately that then have to "create" it themselves. That is no different than the Israeliets needing to build a Golden Calf while Moses reportedly was getting the 10C.
Creationists are our modern-day weak-at-faith followers who are not secure in themselves and who must remake reality because their fixed and absolutions idea doesn't fit reality. It is all rather pathetic and sad.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 06-09-2004 1:52 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by arachnophilia, posted 06-10-2004 12:49 AM Steen has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1370 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 22 of 53 (114053)
06-10-2004 12:49 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Steen
06-10-2004 12:26 AM


this could be interpretted as an attack on certain board members.
but as a christian, i will agree. genesis being literal is not something faith should be based on, and faith does not require proof.
This message has been edited by Arachnophilia, 06-09-2004 11:49 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Steen, posted 06-10-2004 12:26 AM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Steen, posted 06-13-2004 3:23 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 53 (114778)
06-13-2004 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by arachnophilia
06-10-2004 12:49 AM


I didn't have anybody specific in mind, more a long experience with creationists.
As for Faith and proof, that truly is nothing but a new version of the Golden Calf. God doesn't tell us to have evidence of God's existence, but rather to have Faith in God's existence. That doesn't preclude Evolution and other factual events that we can witness with our eyes and evaluate with our brain.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by arachnophilia, posted 06-10-2004 12:49 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 24 of 53 (114779)
06-13-2004 3:29 AM


OK, I'll throw in a topic drift alert
The topic is ring species.
Other themes belong elsewhere.
Adminnemooseus

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Steen, posted 06-15-2004 8:34 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 53 (115540)
06-15-2004 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Adminnemooseus
06-13-2004 3:29 AM


No takers?
Well, it is nice to stay on focus, but no creationists seem interested in having their arguments founder on the solid evidence of ring-species.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-13-2004 3:29 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Chiroptera, posted 06-15-2004 8:37 PM Steen has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 53 (115542)
06-15-2004 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Steen
06-15-2004 8:34 PM


Re: No takers?
[creationist]
But...but... they're still vertebrates!
[/creationist]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Steen, posted 06-15-2004 8:34 PM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Steen, posted 06-16-2004 1:34 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Steen
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 53 (115588)
06-16-2004 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by Chiroptera
06-15-2004 8:37 PM


Re: No takers?
Oh, you make it difficult to be on topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Chiroptera, posted 06-15-2004 8:37 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3954 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 28 of 53 (115837)
06-16-2004 5:34 PM


there are several nice little examples of the same species that lives on either side of a something and when reconnected no longer interact like the same species. for instance, there is a crab that lives both east and west of central america in the respective waters. when they built the panama canal these two east and west crabs were reintroduced... instead of mating, they fought. and of course, the very first principle of speciation is a failure to interbreed. even if it is by 'choice' because they simply don't recognize each other.

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by arachnophilia, posted 06-28-2004 3:12 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1370 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 29 of 53 (119564)
06-28-2004 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by macaroniandcheese
06-16-2004 5:34 PM


now you know that's not the definition.
horses and donkeys interbreed all the time, and they're not the same species.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-16-2004 5:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-28-2004 7:41 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3954 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 30 of 53 (119692)
06-28-2004 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by arachnophilia
06-28-2004 3:12 PM


yes i know. and horses and zebras can be interbred (if i'm not mistaken) not to mention that extinct species of zebra.
there are many more factors to speciation. but failure to breed is one of them. also, there are many more reasons why things can't interbreed than simple genetics. like the mixed signals i mentioned and a few other things.
it's simply not as simple a process as people think.
This message has been edited by brennakimi, 06-28-2004 06:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by arachnophilia, posted 06-28-2004 3:12 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by RAZD, posted 06-28-2004 8:20 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024