Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Happy Birthday: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,146 Year: 5,403/9,624 Month: 428/323 Week: 68/204 Day: 10/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Morality! Thorn in Darwin's side or not?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 270 of 438 (742519)
11-21-2014 4:30 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by Colbard
11-20-2014 9:21 PM


Evolution ultimately has no rights for anyone to live, or any to have quality of life, or any to claim equality.
The species which survives does so because it can and does and for no other reason. There is no purpose for any species except what happens next.
The laws of probability are the name of the game.
It's a sobering thought, isn't it?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by Colbard, posted 11-20-2014 9:21 PM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by Colbard, posted 11-22-2014 7:06 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 334 of 438 (742736)
11-23-2014 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by Colbard
11-22-2014 7:06 AM


You're an idiot.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Colbard, posted 11-22-2014 7:06 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 337 by Colbard, posted 11-24-2014 7:05 AM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024