quote:
Originally posted by KingPenguin:
hehehehe thats funny and your right according to websters dictionary, so congratulations you won. that sucks for creationists then, they have to prove every single part of it wrong.
Actually, you need only to demonstrate the refutation of a single example of those we provided. ANY one of them would falsify the ToE. You don’t have to ‘prove every single one of them’.
[b] [QUOTE]
the theory of evolution is evolving itself, a little weird.
[/b][/QUOTE]
Wouldn’t you be suspicious of a ‘statically unchanging’ theory that didn’t have to address new evidence ?
What explanatory worth would it have ?
Ohh, sorry. Poor choice of questions on my part.
I suppose you aren’t suspicious of Young Earth Creationism. =o)
Therein lies the chief contrast between the ToE and YECism.
- One throws out ( or amends ) the bad hypothesis when contradicting evidence is revealed.
- The other maintains the obsolete hypothesis and throws out the contradicting evidence.
[b] [QUOTE]
also one thing that cant disprove the evolution is the bible, its all made on understandings and lessons for lifes. its not a scientific journal that its been claimed many times to be. [/b][/QUOTE]
Bravo ~!
A treatise on ideology, philosophy and morality cannot comment on the physical, natural mechanisms we observe and seek to understand in science.
We should celebrate any common ground between the two camps.
Kind regards,
jeff