Potential falsifications of the theory of evolution

quote:

---

Originally posted by minnemooseus:
This little packet appears all over the place, as the qualities that a valid theory should have.

​

It should have:
1) testable hypotheses
2) confirming evidence
3) potential falsifications

​

I would be interested in exploring the potential falsifications part of this trio. Since I can honestly disavow having previously posted same trio, I leave it to one of the others of the evolution side, to supply some potential falsifications.

​

Moose

​

---

Being unable to derive any phylogenies from genetic data, that don't, by & large, fit the anatomy/morphological phylogenies that pre-existed genetic analysis.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

quote:

---

Originally posted by KingPenguin:
so your theory has the magical ability to change with the wind?

​

---

What?------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

quote:

---

Originally posted by minnemooseus:
Coluld there not be the result of a partial falsification?

​

I've been thinking about the human fossil in the preCambrian senario.

​

If such a thing were found, would it falsify the TOE in it's entirety? Or would it stand to the side as an unexplained annomaly?

​

Would it mearly put a really big dent in the TOE?

​

After all, there still would be a massive amount of valid scientific support for the TOE.

​

Moose

---

One thing's for sure, even if it was proven that the human fossil was NOT pre cambrian in origin, it would STILL be in Answers In Genesis as a falsification.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.