RAZD writes:
So how old is the earth, out of curiosity ...
I don't know and neither do you. IF we conclude based on the dating methods using radioisotopic dating 4.5 billion years old. IF we conclude based on a Birkeland current there is no way to know the age of anything. I would make the argument that the current state of Science in explaining the universe is out of date. The idea of blackholes, dark energy, inflation, etc and the like are weak ideas.
RAZD writes:
And yet you are still wrong about the flood. There is evidence in the "book of nature" that invalidates that date.
What you mean like with fossilization? You pretty much need a flood, or something to control the micro environments of dead things, to create the right conditions to fossilize bones. What I find more interesting is the passage of giants in Gen 6, Enoch, etc authored thousands of years before we discovered those fossils.
RAZD writes:
Based on what evidence from the "book of nature" ... ? Genetics?
LINK
RAZD writes:
So 200,000 to 300,000 years ago for "adam" and 152,000 to 234,000 years ago for "eve" ... was there a long time before one of "adam's" ribs was transmogrified into "eve" by god-magic?
Or was "eden" 200,000 to 234,000 years ago? and where was it?
There certainly was no world wide flying fantasy flood since then ... (see Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1, Message 7 to Message 9). Or is the "book of nature" lying?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Enjoy
I love all the uncertainty in your last point, how exactly are you so confident?
Enjoy