Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   more evidence for shared ancestry (NOT similarity)
mark24
Member (Idle past 5217 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 31 of 34 (19295)
10-08-2002 5:35 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by peter borger
10-08-2002 1:21 AM


quote:
If creationists' maths is irrelevant, please show me the relevant maths.
Setting yourself upfor a fall, there, Peter B!
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by peter borger, posted 10-08-2002 1:21 AM peter borger has not replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1898 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 32 of 34 (19325)
10-08-2002 11:52 AM


As far as maths go, here is a quick example.
Cretins like to say that the chances of X occurring are 1 in 100 billion (or whatever), therefore, it could not have happened.
They forget what happens if there were 100 billion trials...

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by peter borger, posted 10-08-2002 8:10 PM derwood has replied

  
peter borger
Member (Idle past 7687 days)
Posts: 965
From: australia
Joined: 07-05-2002


Message 33 of 34 (19340)
10-08-2002 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by derwood
10-08-2002 11:52 AM


Dear Dr Page,
Thanks for the example. Could you recommend me some literature on this topic.
Thanks in advance,
Peter

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by derwood, posted 10-08-2002 11:52 AM derwood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by derwood, posted 10-11-2002 2:12 PM peter borger has not replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1898 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 34 of 34 (19647)
10-11-2002 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by peter borger
10-08-2002 8:10 PM


quote:
Originally posted by peter borger:
Dear Dr Page,
Thanks for the example. Could you recommend me some literature on this topic.
Thanks in advance,
Peter

Sure - any statistics book.
You're welcome.
Oh - can you provide some references for the claim that evolutionary bioogists believe that all gene trees and species trees should be congruent, and for the existence of a discipline in science whose sole purpose is to reconcile incongruent trees?
Thanks.
[This message has been edited by SLPx, 10-11-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by peter borger, posted 10-08-2002 8:10 PM peter borger has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024