Evolution theory and teratology

Naa. This is the twisted dishonest thinking of yahoo creationists who, if they had bothered to do the most minimal level of research before opening their mouths to insert their boots, they would have known that mutations are classified beneficial, harmful or neutral based on their effect to the present individual not millions of years from now.They would have known that beneficial mutations give a survival advantage, and more importantly a reproductive advantage, to the individual and that over the generations this beneficial trait will become more and more prevalent as a percentage of the population.But, it seems, such creationists, like yourself, are too intellectually dishonest to find out what the concepts really mean before they throw out insults.Edited by AZPaul3, : change title

You mean two questions. You just can't get anything right can you. Nature. Yes.I take it back. You were right about that last one. Congratulations.