One Question for Evo-Bashers

quote:

---

Originally posted by sonnikke:

​

If you're looking for "new organism being designed, formed, and plopped", then look to the fossil record, 140+/- years of documented fully formed distinct creatures extracted from the earth, validating the record of the process you mentioned.

---

As opposed to half-formed? What does that mean, exactly?

quote:

---

We can infer design simply by common logic based on thousands of design cases in every day life, and if you really want, we can back it up by archaeologically verified ancient documents describing the creation event by an intelligent Designer.

---

So, because we know, say, computers are desinged today, and we know that, say, the pyramids were designed, therefore, it is logical to say that biological entities were also designed...I see....And all animals are human, too....

quote:

---

Originally posted by peter borger:
dear John,

​

J: Einstein had evidence. Everyone knew there were problems with the existing theories. A lot of people were working on it. Einstein was the one who put it together correctly, first.

​

PB: every self respecting objective scientist knows evolutionism is in trouble. I will give you 10 examples that bring it down:

​

1) the redundant Src kinase family,
2) the redundant alpha actinin family,
3) the 1G5 gene
4) the swim reflex in conjunction with the gag reflex in newborn
5) the ancient mtDNA in human/primates
6) the ZFY region
7) the ZFX gene/exon
8) the insoluble IL-1beta incongruence
9) the LCR16a gene
10)the wollemi's invariable DNA

​

Genetic redundnacies in general are sufficient to bring down evolutionism since they do not demonstrate a relationship with gene duplications. Genetic redundancies leave the evolutionary community with complete surprise and disbelief (Nature - Not Found). The same accounts for adaptive mutations (Nature - Not Found).

​

Have a nice day,
Peter

​

"Random mutations & selection? Ancient humbug!"

---

As you have contributed to the overthrow of evolutionism, I was perplexed, as you can imagine, when I did a literature search for your name and 'evolutionism' and 'overthrow' and I got zero returns...Perhaps you can provide a citation - or better yet, a reprint - of your seminal publications on this issue.Thanks...

PB:
the ancient mtDNA in human/primates I do hope that you are still not trying to claim that the paper in question posits a human-chimp divergence at 150,000 years ago...If so, that one example will "bring down" your entire feces..

​

I mean thesis...