Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   One Question for Evo-Bashers
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6475 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 5 of 102 (26014)
12-09-2002 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by DanskerMan
12-06-2002 4:56 PM


S:
Because it's an oxymoron, you cannot realize and accept God and that "natural un-guided processes" were NOT the cause of the world, and remain "secular". Once the veil is lifted off your mind, you will invariably become a christian scientist (creationist).
M: That is why there are scientists who are christians but "christian science" as practiced (LOL!) by groups like ICR is not science. They tack on the word science to give themselves the appearance of credibility that they do not posess.
"Because it's an oxymoron, you cannot realize and accept God and that "natural un-guided processes" were NOT the cause of the world, and remain "secular". "
M: You sure put a lot of limits on your god...he/she/it seems to be shrinking progressively by your constraints.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by DanskerMan, posted 12-06-2002 4:56 PM DanskerMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Brad McFall, posted 12-09-2002 11:30 AM Mammuthus has not replied

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6475 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 28 of 102 (27145)
12-18-2002 3:51 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by peter borger
12-18-2002 3:28 AM


Hey Peter...where you been lately?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by peter borger, posted 12-18-2002 3:28 AM peter borger has not replied

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6475 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 43 of 102 (27463)
12-20-2002 5:46 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by derwood
12-20-2002 12:27 AM


quote:
Originally posted by SLPx:
PB:
the ancient mtDNA in human/primates
I do hope that you are still not trying to claim that the paper in question posits a human-chimp divergence at 150,000 years ago...If so, that one example will "bring down" your entire feces..
I mean thesis...

Actually, everything on his list has been shown to be 1. a result of Borger's lack of any kind of relevant background in genetics and thus completely distorted views i.e. W.nobilis, ZFX 2. Ignoring the evidence exactly against what he is saying 3. claiming that the authors for any reference given against his point either say exactly the opposite of what they are saying or that the data says something that is does not i.e. 150 kya last common ancestor of chimp and human.
4. And most commonly, being repeatedly demonstrated to be wrong but then repeating the same falsehoods over and over without ever substantiating the claims.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by derwood, posted 12-20-2002 12:27 AM derwood has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by peter borger, posted 12-20-2002 5:36 PM Mammuthus has not replied
 Message 56 by peter borger, posted 12-20-2002 5:45 PM Mammuthus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024