Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwinist Creationists comments invited
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 43 (28494)
01-06-2003 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Syamsu
01-06-2003 10:05 AM


quote:
There are no definitions of Natural Selection on the web which do not require variation that I can find
I've just googled "natural selection definition" and the first result I got was:
The process by which individuals’ inherited needs and abilities are more or less closely matched to resources available in their environment, giving those with greater "fitness" a better chance of survival and reproduction.
PE
------------------
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense - Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Syamsu, posted 01-06-2003 10:05 AM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Syamsu, posted 01-07-2003 1:43 AM Primordial Egg has replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 43 (28573)
01-07-2003 6:59 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Syamsu
01-07-2003 1:43 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Syamsu:
Greater fitness only can refer to differing variants, not clones, in standard theory of Natural Selection.
regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

Where do you get that idea from?
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Syamsu, posted 01-07-2003 1:43 AM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Syamsu, posted 01-07-2003 9:19 AM Primordial Egg has replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 43 (28591)
01-07-2003 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Syamsu
01-07-2003 9:19 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Syamsu:
Evolution and Philosophy: Tautology
"The current understanding of fitness is dispositional. That is to say, fitness is a disposition of a trait to reproduce better than competitors. It is not deterministic. If two twins are identical genetically, and therefore are equally fit, there is no guarantee that they will both survive to have equal numbers of offspring. Fitness is a statistical property." (John Wilkins, 1997)
regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

I'm afraid you're going to have to spell out for me why you think fitness = variation. The above seems to contradict you, if anything.
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Syamsu, posted 01-07-2003 9:19 AM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Syamsu, posted 01-07-2003 12:29 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024