"... where Archaeopteryx is classified with the dinosaurs. You will notice also that archie was originally classified as a dinosaur and some specimens were considered to be compsognathus for a time. In fact, I have read on TO that Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (both, I believe, creationists) have argued that archie is actually a hoax composed of dinosaur fossils with feathers attached. Just how do you explain all this confusion?"
--Maybe they were referring to
Archaeoraptor? If they were talking about
Archaeopteryx, they've probably asked to be ignored.
--A recent article in
Discover (February 2003) entitled
Plucking Apart the Dino-Birds (
Discover Dialogue between Kathy A. Svitil & Ornithologist and Evolutionary Biologist, Alan Feduccia), is very interesting. Fedducia thinks birds are not descended from dinosaurs and this is briefly discussed in the dialogue.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 01-31-2003]