Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   IC & the Cambrian Explosion for Ahmad...cont..
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 199 (25210)
12-02-2002 2:19 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by mark24
12-01-2002 8:10 PM


Say, if he sees it like that (polyphyletic origin of phyla / one phylum equals one created kind, one 'creative act'), then I would expect Ahmad having no problems about evolution within each phylum. Sure, the ancestor of vertebrates did appear fully-formed one fine Cambrian evening by a miraculous act of creation; during the next 500 million years, they gave rise to bony fish, amphibians, dinosaurs, australopiths, and us through conventinal macroevolutionary processes.
Hey, come to think of it, I don't have a problem with that kind of creationism...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by mark24, posted 12-01-2002 8:10 PM mark24 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Ahmad, posted 12-02-2002 6:48 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 199 (30654)
01-30-2003 3:29 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by peter borger
01-30-2003 12:16 AM


What about the four-winged Microraptor gui? Maybe you can use it as an example of a 'wider' genome in the past?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by peter borger, posted 01-30-2003 12:16 AM peter borger has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 199 (30950)
02-01-2003 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by wj
02-01-2003 7:25 AM


Didn't he told you? One MPG=one phylum. However, he keeps humans and chimps separate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by wj, posted 02-01-2003 7:25 AM wj has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by mark24, posted 02-01-2003 12:02 PM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 105 of 199 (31011)
02-01-2003 10:05 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by TrueCreation
02-01-2003 7:05 PM


FYI I agree with Feduccia also. The dromaeosaurs which dinosaur experts claim to be bird ancestors are committed runners. And IMO top-down flight evolution is more plausible than bottom-up. Take a look at Microraptor gui, this fossil showed a stage before Archaeopteryx. I agree with Feduccia, Chatterjee, and Mayr. And Darwin's original proposal of flight evolution is top-down (in bats, analogous to squirrels).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by TrueCreation, posted 02-01-2003 7:05 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 199 (31765)
02-08-2003 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by peter borger
02-08-2003 3:29 PM


quote:
Thewissen, J. G. M. and M. Aria 1994. Fossil evidence for the origin of aquatic locomotion in archaeocete whales. Science 263: 210-12.
PB: Yeah, I know this paper. Fossil evidence of another MPG.
Dr Borger, did all whales come from one MPG (Ambulocetus?) or should they be split into three MPGs (archaeocetes(paraphyletic), toothed whales(paraphyletic), baleen whales (monophyletic)) or four (archaeocetes, baleen whales, sperm whales, dolphins (including orca)) or five (archaeocetes, baleen whales, sperm whales, dolphins, orca) or one MPG=one genus, or one MPG=one species like Homo vs Pan?
[This message has been edited by Andya Primanda, 02-08-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by peter borger, posted 02-08-2003 3:29 PM peter borger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Andya Primanda, posted 02-12-2003 9:21 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 154 of 199 (32038)
02-12-2003 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by Andya Primanda
02-08-2003 10:08 PM


quote:
Thewissen, J. G. M. and M. Aria 1994. Fossil evidence for the origin of aquatic locomotion in archaeocete whales. Science 263: 210-12.
PB: Yeah, I know this paper. Fossil evidence of another MPG.
Dr Borger, did all whales come from one MPG (Ambulocetus?) or should they be split into three MPGs (archaeocetes(paraphyletic), toothed whales(paraphyletic), baleen whales (monophyletic)) or four (archaeocetes, baleen whales, sperm whales, dolphins (including orca)) or five (archaeocetes, baleen whales, sperm whales, dolphins, orca) or one MPG=one genus, or one MPG=one species like Homo vs Pan?
[reissued]
You asked me to make predictions based on the GUTOB (the MPG side), and these are what I come up with. Please elaborate my predictions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Andya Primanda, posted 02-08-2003 10:08 PM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 199 (32041)
02-12-2003 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by peter borger
02-12-2003 7:07 AM


Since we're into whale MPGs let me throw in two other examples
Dorudon atrox & Rodhocetus balochistanensis
That is the page of Philip Gingerich. He has some free PDFs at the bottom of the page.
My prediction based on GUTOB: Rodhocetus was near the original Cetacea MPG, but it still has hind legs. Later processes eliminate the leg.
Why do I start to think that the legs were created just to be eliminated later?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by peter borger, posted 02-12-2003 7:07 AM peter borger has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024