Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,849 Year: 4,106/9,624 Month: 977/974 Week: 304/286 Day: 25/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The egg came first
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 4 of 111 (234664)
08-18-2005 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by New Cat's Eye
08-18-2005 8:22 PM


Randman over easy...
Catholic Scientist writes:
Is it an egg that came out of a chicken or an egg that has a chicken in it? You've defined the chicken egg as an egg with a chicken in it, so I'll agree that the egg came first. But that egg was laid by the something else that was its immediate predecessor, so it could be considered to not be a chicken egg, which could be used to say the chicken came first, but whatever.
I think we've found randman's transitional form.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-18-2005 8:22 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-18-2005 8:41 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 6 of 111 (234673)
08-18-2005 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by New Cat's Eye
08-18-2005 8:41 PM


Re: Randman over easy...
randman has demanded ad nauseam the "transitional" species, essentially wanting evidence of one species giving birth to another. If the first chicken in an egg was not an egg from a chicken...voila!
Sorry if it was lame, CS.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-18-2005 8:41 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024