A lot of others got to you first, Fredd but I'll pile on a little here
Try
http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/creation/fossil_series.htmlfor several examples of smooth change in transitional fossils for inverterbrates.
all this sound and fury over the evolution sham is only a cover for the complete inability of creationists to come up with any complete, internally consistient explanation of the geological and fossil record.THE sham in view is creationists trying to poke holes in the theory of evolution while refusing to come to terms with the problems with their model.You do have a model, don't you, Fred?Waitasecond, you dont have one on your website? I'm sure thats an accident!I'm sure that you will post one somewhere, sometime on this forum.Until then, your article signifies nothing but a rehash of the same old creationist arguments that have been repeatedly refuted.