Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fossils - Exposing the Evolutionist slight-of-hand
Peter
Member (Idle past 1501 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 20 of 90 (13808)
07-19-2002 6:44 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Fred Williams
01-11-2002 4:51 PM


Out of curiosity, how within a creationist model
do you account for the huge discreprancy in numbers
of vertebrate and invertebrate fossils ?
In the evolutionary model it's straightforward, the
invertebrates have been around much longer and so have
had greater opportunity to be represented in the fossil
record.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Fred Williams, posted 01-11-2002 4:51 PM Fred Williams has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Andor, posted 07-19-2002 6:53 AM Peter has replied
 Message 25 by NimLore, posted 11-07-2002 9:29 PM Peter has not replied

Peter
Member (Idle past 1501 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 22 of 90 (14006)
07-23-2002 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Andor
07-19-2002 6:53 AM


I did wonder whether the answer might come back as
'well there are more of them.' but I'm not entirely
convinced that would satisfy such a vast discreprancy
in the numbers of finds.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Andor, posted 07-19-2002 6:53 AM Andor has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024