crashfrog writes:
But Behe and Dembski largely support evolution, except that they believe that certain things can't be explained by it. But they're by no means creationists.
I'm not sure I can agree with this. Behe *does* accept much of evolution, but rejects its ability to create what he believes are irreducibly complex structures. As a significant force in the Intelligent Design movement I don't see how he could be considered anthing but an OEC (Old Earth Creationist, since we have a bunch of newbies recently on board).
And Dembski is the author of the Law of Conservation of Information. He believes he has proven it impossible to create new information through random processes like mutation, and that since evolution requires new information that it is therefore impossible. It seems to me that he, too, must be classified as a Creationist.
--Percy
™ Version 4.2