Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
67 online now:
dwise1, jar, kjsimons, nwr, Phat (5 members, 62 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,191 Year: 4,303/6,534 Month: 517/900 Week: 41/182 Day: 13/16 Hour: 1/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Best" evidence for evolution.
justatruthseeker
Member (Idle past 2405 days)
Posts: 117
From: Tulsa, OK, USA
Joined: 05-05-2013


Message 94 of 830 (763411)
07-24-2015 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by New Cat's Eye
11-05-2014 11:43 AM


Re: Best evidence for TOE? All the evidence.
How do you figure that?

I see Asian mating with African producing an Afro-Asian by the recombination of genes and new dominant and recessive traits. We see no evolution through mutation nor any imaginary missing links between the three of them.

We observe Husky mating with Mastiff producing the Chinook - again with no evolution or missing links between them.

All we observe is breed mating with breed producing new breeds (variation) within the species by the recombination of genes and new dominant and recessive traits.

We observe no evolution by mutation anywhere in the natural world. They have simply misclassified 95% of the fossil records as separate species, when they are in reality breeds of one species or another.

These:

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTulI5Kd1LKklC79...

Are no different than these:

http://www.alegoo.com/...-dog-breeds/small-dog-breeds-17.jpg

Just as they incorrectly classified Darwin's Finches as separate species before even studying them. Then when we do study them we find they have been interbreeding and producing fertile offspring since they arrived on the islands. But as usual, evolutionists refuse to correct their mistakes.

And so babies and adults of the same species also gets incorrectly classified as separate species.

https://www.ted.com/.../jack_horner_shape_shifting_dinosaurs

And fossils belonging to man.

http://www.theguardian.com/...l-homo-erectus-human-evolution

Once you clear up all those mistakes and wipe half of them from the books, you will be left with nothing to theorize upon except Kind after Kind.

EDIT: We agree the preponderance of the evidence should be the deciding factor, and all of nature declares it is breed mating with breed creating new breeds within the species that causes variation. Not evolution.

Edited by justatruthseeker, : No reason given.


If one closes their eyes they can imagine a universe of infinite possibilities, but until one opens their eyes they will never see the light.

Fairie Dust - Fabricated Ad-hoc Inventions Repeatedly Invoked in Effort to Defend Untenable Scientific Theory.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by New Cat's Eye, posted 11-05-2014 11:43 AM New Cat's Eye has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by caffeine, posted 07-24-2015 4:25 PM justatruthseeker has taken no action
 Message 96 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-24-2015 4:53 PM justatruthseeker has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022