|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: All species are transitional | |||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
problem with defining a species as an "isolated gene pool." Half the problem is that there is no {line\delineation} but a gradual change over time that accumulates until at some point a person says "hey, that's different!" The other half the problem is that you do get two or more different populations that diverge, and at some point they stop interacting genetically: it could be due to {non-compatible sex} but it is more likely to be {non-desire} - they don't see the others as potential mates due to differences in appearances or behavior. The Asian Warbler ring species is a good example here.http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~irwin/Greenish%20warblers.html The {non-desire} can be the shadow-line (sometimes crossed) and two species can co-exist with near similar genes but not actively breed - becoming less able to interbreed as time passes until another shadow line is crossed: sterile offspring (the donkey, zebra and horse). The final shadow line is crossed when breeding no longer produces living offspring. Even with population isolation there is not hard fast line but a period of transition. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
To me part of the problem is the concept itself. How isolated is isolated? Are we talking islands?
Did you check the ring species article? Each variety occupies a distinct geological area and only overlap on the boundaries (and that is where hybreds occur). Are they isolated or just dispersed? When you get around to the end of the ring they behave as if isolated. Sometimes yes, it can be a distinct line: non-migratory birds on Hawaiian Islands are isolated from the mainland species they are (distantly) related to and always have been. Other times not so distinct. There are no clear "rules" here, because ultimately it is a totally artificial construction of human making. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
khakies?
I'm shocked. are the cuffs rolled? by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Is there a particular point in time, a particular generation, which we can say is a new species, using the definition of isolated gene pool? You already included it:
When this heavily speckled creatue meets an un-speckled creature, they do not recognize each other as potential mates. That is isolation by sexual selection, failure to mix genes. Where the gray fuzzy boundary lies is when the intermediately speckled still mate with both the unspeckled and the heavily speckled. This can still lead to some genetic flow between the two isolated populations but it is generations apart (carried by the lightly speckled ones) by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Lets look at it this way
We have 4 groups based on genetic possibilities NN - non-speckled (both genes)SS - darkly speckled (both genes) NS - lightly speckled (one gene each) SN - lightly speckled (one gene each) for all intents and purposes NS = SN so we can reduce this to 3 groups Now assume that NN mates with NN or NS but not SSNS mates with NN or NS or SS SS mates with SS or NS but not NN We have isolation between NN and SS but not anywhere else in the population, so there is still some interbreeding between all others and still some genetic interchange between NN and SS by way of NS interactions. Note that NS is as large as both NN and SS combined, once S has become established in the population (which started as NN) AND in the absence of selection pressure to diverge. Is this a new species on day one of SS? Not really, because still breeds with a major (NS) portion of the population that is still part of the "old" species. It rather the beginning of the divergence. Final divergence is achieved when NS disappears due to sexual selection of NN for only NN {AND?\OR?} of SS for only SS. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
But can you guarantee that sexual isolation remains a dividing factor?
Perhaps if a survival stress were applied to the area where the asian green warbler ring species overlaps that there would exist individuals that would interbreed even after having been sexually isolated. You could have transition back and forth. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
The sexual selection barrier may apply when the living is easy, but when times get tough the selection of mates may be less picky when survival is at stake.
This was observed on the Galapagos Islands when two finch species interbred during a drought that did not interbreed before or after the drought. Line ... no line ... line ... by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Wish I could explain that to my neighbour`s Dalmatian ... What you are seeing is (usually male) sexual behavior with object less and less similar to potential mates due to a lack of better opportunities. This is one of the driving forces for the trend to regress species diversity in times of survival stress. Or it is in love with an image of the master. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Any way to know why they didn't interbreed before that? General lack of opportunity coupled with plentiful normal opportunity would by my assumption. When species are in survival stress they tend to move outside native territories looking for ones more like what they knew before, and this puts them into a position of more interaction with other species. On the Galapagos we have descrete islands so it is easy to focus on when the barriers are crossed. by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
or that there is one kind: life.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
a grief history of time?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
or the camel\llama hybrid ... or the "liger" ...
I was talking about the galapagos finches during the drought where some interbreeding was observed between {otherwise classified as different species} individuals.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
See several examples of speciation at
Speciation & hybridization (click) V. "Instant speciation" via polyploidy etc. Plants can speciate almost instantaneously by changing the ploidy (number of sets) of their chromosomes, accompanied by their ability to persist/disperse as "founders" via asexual reproduction. They spread vegetatively and don't necessarily have to deal with the problem of sexual reproduction for some time. In animals, less dramatically, a more rapid founder effect process (Mayr, 1942; Templeton, 1996) may sometimes be an alternative to the gradual process usually considered to dominate speciation in animals. On population genetics grounds, Slatkin (1996) argued for the potential importance of what is sometimes called "founder flush" speciation in the face of several dismissive reviews of the process. For animals, the major interest in "instant" speciation involves rapid divergence due to a few changes in major regulatory genes affecting development. Recently, however, a tetraploid rodent was discovered in South America (Gallardo et al., 1999). I suspect that few biologists would have considered this a possibility until it was reported. I think you were thinking of this tetraploid rodent - it's been discussed here before IIRC Page not found - My Kratom And Weed Bloghttp://www.cricyt.edu.ar/...S/iadiza/ojeda/grecia%202000.htm enjoy {fix link - mixed ub with html} This message has been edited by RAZD, 11*03*2005 06:49 PM by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024