Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   All species are transitional
ausar_maat
Member (Idle past 5527 days)
Posts: 136
From: Toronto
Joined: 10-04-2005


Message 17 of 246 (249089)
10-05-2005 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by NosyNed
10-04-2005 7:24 PM


Re: not transitional without descendents?
quote:
At some point in time there were probably 100's or 1,000's of species that were all cousins and all part way along the path from dinosaur to bird.
So what is the current supra transitional sequence between all of them at the moment then? According to what is known?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by NosyNed, posted 10-04-2005 7:24 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
ausar_maat
Member (Idle past 5527 days)
Posts: 136
From: Toronto
Joined: 10-04-2005


Message 28 of 246 (249394)
10-06-2005 7:23 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by JustinC
10-05-2005 10:28 PM


Hypothetically,
how would the discovery of a H.Sapien in a much earlier period, say in Australopithecus afarensis period between 3 and 4 million years ago, how would that impact our current evolution paradigm. This is not a creationist trick question. I'm honestly just curious?
thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by JustinC, posted 10-05-2005 10:28 PM JustinC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by JustinC, posted 10-06-2005 11:35 AM ausar_maat has not replied
 Message 32 by jar, posted 10-06-2005 11:40 AM ausar_maat has replied

  
ausar_maat
Member (Idle past 5527 days)
Posts: 136
From: Toronto
Joined: 10-04-2005


Message 33 of 246 (249508)
10-06-2005 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by jar
10-06-2005 11:40 AM


quote:
the time frame is still short evolutionary speaking
the current one or the hypothesis?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by jar, posted 10-06-2005 11:40 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by jar, posted 10-06-2005 11:50 AM ausar_maat has replied

  
ausar_maat
Member (Idle past 5527 days)
Posts: 136
From: Toronto
Joined: 10-04-2005


Message 35 of 246 (249523)
10-06-2005 12:33 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by jar
10-06-2005 11:50 AM


Re: ?????????
actually I was quoting JustinC,
I wondered what he meant

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by jar, posted 10-06-2005 11:50 AM jar has not replied

  
ausar_maat
Member (Idle past 5527 days)
Posts: 136
From: Toronto
Joined: 10-04-2005


Message 38 of 246 (249558)
10-06-2005 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Chiroptera
10-06-2005 2:00 PM


I'm in no position to make any affirmation, but I still wondered, since it seems the term "transitionals" is arbitrary and besides, all fossils from the tchadensis to the habilis were mainly found in Eastern Africa, wouldn't the discovery of a more modern homo sapien in a much earlier period just indicate that, perhaps, the species we simply other species now extinct? I mean they still don't really know if the tchadensis was actually on our side or the chip's for example.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Chiroptera, posted 10-06-2005 2:00 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Chiroptera, posted 10-06-2005 2:42 PM ausar_maat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024