Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where is the evidence for evolution?
John
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 367 (30427)
01-28-2003 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by MRC_Hans
01-28-2003 2:37 AM


quote:
Please, no abbeviations, I'm new here and I dont find it productive to guess at what various letter codes mean.
If you hang around long, here are some abreviations you'll see.
ToE == the theory of evolution
GUToB == PeterBorger's pet theory == God-awful Unsupportable Tarradiddle of Bull
NS == natural selection
LOL == laugh out loud
ROTFLMAO == rolling on the floor laughing my arse off-- prolly not used often enough
Sometimes people's login IDs are abbreviated as well.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by MRC_Hans, posted 01-28-2003 2:37 AM MRC_Hans has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by MRC_Hans, posted 01-28-2003 10:55 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 367 (30437)
01-28-2003 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by MRC_Hans
01-28-2003 10:55 AM


quote:
Yes, I later read up on GUToB. I hope Peter can educate me sometime, because off-hand I dont think it makes too much sense.
I believe most of us share that sentiment.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by MRC_Hans, posted 01-28-2003 10:55 AM MRC_Hans has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by DanskerMan, posted 01-28-2003 11:38 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 367 (30481)
01-28-2003 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by DanskerMan
01-28-2003 11:38 AM


PeterB has been trounced at every turn. I don't think it we who need to learn something.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by DanskerMan, posted 01-28-2003 11:38 AM DanskerMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by judge, posted 01-29-2003 3:53 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 367 (30560)
01-29-2003 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by judge
01-29-2003 3:53 AM


quote:
I wonder would you be able to explain concisely exactly how PB has been trounced at every turn?
Can you explain how he was trounced in his analysis of mtDNA?

This stuff spans twenty pages and several threads. Is there a specific claim? Looks like the bulk of the mtDNA material involves randon vs. non-random material. Is this the subject you intend? Let me know. I'll deal with it later today, I hope. Looks like a busy one.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by judge, posted 01-29-2003 3:53 AM judge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by judge, posted 01-29-2003 3:45 PM John has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 367 (31471)
02-05-2003 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by wj
02-05-2003 6:12 PM


quote:
"creationist molecular biologist and microbiologist" Dr Ian Macreadie.
Why does he look like John Cleese?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by wj, posted 02-05-2003 6:12 PM wj has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by David unfamous, posted 02-06-2003 12:03 PM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 367 (31541)
02-06-2003 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by David unfamous
02-06-2003 12:03 PM


quote:
That's not John Cleese. Note the Flux Capacitor in the background?
I'm sure Mr. Cleese has fluxed many capacitors.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by David unfamous, posted 02-06-2003 12:03 PM David unfamous has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 367 (31692)
02-07-2003 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Chavalon
02-07-2003 4:14 PM


quote:
They all regard their subject as an art.
I'd say so too. Math lacks several components associated with science-- like experiment, and observation.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Chavalon, posted 02-07-2003 4:14 PM Chavalon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by peter borger, posted 02-07-2003 7:40 PM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 134 of 367 (31947)
02-11-2003 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by peter borger
02-07-2003 7:40 PM


The ToE is subject to change as new information arises. This means it is not tautological.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by peter borger, posted 02-07-2003 7:40 PM peter borger has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 367 (32120)
02-13-2003 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 154 by Peter
02-13-2003 8:28 AM


I can look this up later-- I have to go to work now -- but if memory serves, the wisdom tooth problem has more to do with the restructuring of our face and jaw than with the replacing of worn teeth. Compare the jutting jaws of other primates with the tiny human jaw.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Peter, posted 02-13-2003 8:28 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by Peter, posted 02-19-2003 7:48 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 190 of 367 (32424)
02-17-2003 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by Zephan
02-17-2003 7:49 AM


quote:
Which unwittingly proves my point about abiogenesis being an imperative of evolution.
But it isn't. Evolution doesn't require abiogenesis. It only requires that something started the process. That something can be anything. That is the rub. That is why people consider evolution and abiogenesis to be different topics. Creationism itself is proof of this point. Creationists-- modern progressive creationists -- generally accept some form of evolution but NOT ABIOGENESIS, opting for the creation of distinct kinds or divine manipulation of DNA or some such.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Zephan, posted 02-17-2003 7:49 AM Zephan has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 197 of 367 (32645)
02-19-2003 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by Peter
02-19-2003 7:48 AM


Yes. I know that.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Peter, posted 02-19-2003 7:48 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Peter, posted 02-19-2003 10:54 AM John has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 271 of 367 (33847)
03-07-2003 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by DanskerMan
03-07-2003 9:50 AM


Re: lies
If this is the case, why do the lies so often come from sites like IRC?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by DanskerMan, posted 03-07-2003 9:50 AM DanskerMan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024