Hi david12:
david12 writes:
I am not
asking for differences on lets say, a horse, that has a different number of
toes. A horse with one toe and a horse with two are both horses.
Ok, a horse has "one" toe and deer has "two" toes (actually, horses are perissodactylids (odd toed) while deer are artiodactylids (even toed)...but that's just nit-picking). Are you suggesting that a horse and a deer are the same species?
david12 writes:
If we are talking science, which most evolution based men do, how do you
justify evolution when the Law of Entropy and the Law of the conservation of
matter have been scientifically proven?
You need to do a bit of reading...this has been covered many many times in this forum alone. Evolution in no way violates thermodynamic laws.
david12 writes:
Every component in the eye needs to be present and alligned for it to work.
Not true. Again, do some reading before making statements like this.
david12 writes:
If they eye is evolving(a fishes eye is different than ours) then how come everything isnt blind?
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here, can you explain what you mean by this?
david12 writes:
(this is just a point if you want to contradict it you may) Everything
in the world has a creator.
Define "creator". To me, mutation and natural selection fit your statement, but somehow I doubt that you see it that way.
david12 writes:
The computer im looking at was
put together in a factory somewhere, and the pieces to make it were formed
by a creator as well.
When was the last time you saw two computers copulate?
david12 writes:
Is it not feasable to conclude that the earth and its
inhabitants have a creator too?
Again, define "creator".