Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   more problems for the "directed mutation" zealots
Itzpapalotl
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 13 (22479)
11-13-2002 10:43 AM


This research may be the latest nail in the coffin of 'directed mutation' it's by no means the first:
D. I. Andersson, E. S. Slechta, and J. R. Roth. Evidence that gene amplification underlies adaptive mutability of the bacterial lac operon. Science 282 (5391):1133-1135, 1998.
"Apparent directed mutability, its recombination requirement, and its apparent independence of cell growth are all accounted for by the model. Evidence is provided for the required residual function and gene amplification"
E. S. Slechta, J. Harold, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth. The effect of genomic position on reversion of a lac frameshift mutation (lacIZ33) during non-lethal selection (adaptive mutation). Mol.Microbiol. 44 (4):1017-1032, 2002.
E. S. Slechta, J. Liu, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth. Evidence That Selected Amplification of a Bacterial lac Frameshift Allele Stimulates Lac(+) Reversion (Adaptive Mutation) With or Without General Hypermutability. Genetics 161 (3):945-956, 2002.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by derwood, posted 11-13-2002 12:27 PM Itzpapalotl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024