Evolution Simplified

Well, its inevitable that most populations are not increasing. If they were, there's be way too many animals on the planet. It seems so obvious to me I don't know how you can't see it. The claim isn't about all populations, just most of them. We can't have most of the populations increasing. Yes. Again the claim is only for some, not all, of the traits. Nope, we know of mutations that are not neutral, they cannot all be neutral. Yes, because of inaccurate replication.

Why do you care if its "theoretically possible"? Traits exist that are not neutral, therefore not all traits are neutral. What are you doing? whats your point? Sure, call it what you will.By inaccurate replication I mean replication as a thing. It is a replication that is different that the original.By imperfect replication I think of the process. The process isn't perfect and leads to differences. Yes. After replication, when there is a difference, that difference is a mutation. The replication is imperfect, it leads to inaccurate replications that have differences.

For what?Why is it so hard for you to accept something even when everyone is telling you it? C'mon now. Just think about it. A trait would have to not affect anything to be neutral. Aren't there traits that have effects?