Hi, Mike the Wiz.
mike the wiz writes:
If creation is true, you would expect that bacteria would be found in the fossils, as recognisable.
As opposed to evolution, which predicts that fossils will be unrecognizable.
-----
mike the wiz writes:
Now given the hyper-ability of bacteria, to mutate, given that higher organisms such as humans don't have this phenomenal ability, we would expect EVEN MORE evolution. Yet what do we find? Powerful evidence that they adapt but do not change over time.
First off, how does a bacterium adapt without changing?
Second, why do you feel that the shape of a cell must change over time? The skin cells of a giraffe look pretty much the same as the skin cells of a hagfish.
Given this observation, why do you think the Theory of Evolution needs a cell's gross morphology to change over time?
-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.
™ Version 4.2
