Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,472 Year: 3,729/9,624 Month: 600/974 Week: 213/276 Day: 53/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Archaeopteryx; bird or reptile, or both?"
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 34 (214469)
06-05-2005 9:22 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Palaeos
06-04-2005 1:25 AM


Re: Dromaeosaur
Could something like Archaeopteryx be the ancestor of later dromaeosaurs? I mean, maybe the dino-bird people see the whole thing backwards, assuming that because birds are with us here today and velociraptors are not, then it is concluded that birds are derived from the classic dromaeosaurs (Deinonychus, Velociraptor etal.) Which we all know imply a large gap in the dromaeosaurid fossil record back to the Jurassic.
My hunch on this is
primitive theropod/thecodont ---> pre-archaeopteryx (arboreal raptors, something like Microraptor gui) ---> Archaeopteryx ---> (dromaeosaurids) (modern birds)
in which an Archaeopteryx-like ancestor gave rise to two groups, modern birds (perfecting adaptations for flight) and dromaeosaurids (entering another niche as swift predators)
I know the dino-bird theory is more popular, but I still think the paleontologists need to look in the Jurassic for fossils earlier than Archy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Palaeos, posted 06-04-2005 1:25 AM Palaeos has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024