Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,410 Year: 3,667/9,624 Month: 538/974 Week: 151/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Archaeopteryx; bird or reptile, or both?"
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 29 of 34 (552432)
03-29-2010 5:35 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Peg
03-27-2010 1:41 AM


the biggest problem for evolutionists and Archaeopteryx is that it does not predate birds, because fossils of other birds have been found in rocks of the same period
if it was one of these so called 'transitional fossils' then it should have existed long before birds became a species, yes?
I have said before that one of the strange paradoxes of creationism is that creationists are obsessed with biology but not remotely interested in it.
This would be a case in point.
Leaving aside your gross and contemptible ignorance of the fossil record, you just wrote the words: "birds became a species".
This is the point at which you should hide your face in shame.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Peg, posted 03-27-2010 1:41 AM Peg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024