Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Population Genetics
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 15 of 90 (364038)
11-16-2006 6:57 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by PaulK
11-16-2006 6:19 AM


Can you explain why ReMine's claim of a maximum of 1667 beneifical nucleotide substitutions should be considered valid ?
There doesn't seem any reason NJ should have to do that, because it isn't his position. From the OP,
quote:
The argument has been expounded by others who assert that substitutions into the population might be larger than a nucleotide. This includes insertion/deletion or inversion/duplication. Each of these count as a substitution
Does ReMine claim it is nucleotides? If he does, then an interesting question would be why NJ chooses to depart from ReMine on this issue.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by PaulK, posted 11-16-2006 6:19 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by PaulK, posted 11-16-2006 7:28 AM Modulous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024