There are certain evidences that Colonel Mustard committed murder with a lead pipe in the conservatory. It is unknown whether the Colonel was the product of natural or artificial insemination. Are we therefore to conclude that, without regard to the certain evidences, the Colonel is to go free?
Accept the point that origin has nothing to do with evolution and stop applying it to you argument against evolution or explain why it must be taken into account. You've been repeating the same course in twenty word posts for the better half of this thread. maybe if you tried to condense you thoughts into a single four hundred word post you'd recognize that the bits don't fit together.
A bit of my family lore: I've an aunt whom made these two statements within five minutes of each other:
quote:
The world is 1982 years old. (Can you guess when she said this?)
And:
quote:
Dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago.
Hours passed before anyone could get her to understand the contradiction in these two statements but it was eventually done. The argument then turned to the error of the first statement. That too was resolved. But to this day, without updating either statement to reflect the passage of time ” 65,000,027 years ago ” she still insisted that both statements are true for the first few minutes of the argument.
You're doing the same thing, though admittedly less blatantly.
Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.