quote:
And, 95% of Americans think the "j" in "Beijing" is pronounced like a French "j." They're still wrong, too.
I think this is a bad example to demonstrate your point. If it's true that a vast majority of Americans pronounce it that way (that's how I say it too), then surely that's how it's pronounced in American English. How universal does a shift in pronounciation need to become before it's a linguistic shift and not just people being wrong? And it's not really relevant how the Chinese say it. The French don't pronounce any 's' in 'Paris' and there isn't a 'g' in the Czech for 'Prague' (sorry for the nitpick).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
As for evidence of evolution in modern biology - there's plenty of it, and I'd imagine you'd already heard the most famous examples - so please explain why you find them insufficient. There's the geograpghicsl distribution of animals and plants - why do species on the Galapagos seem to most closely resemble species on the nearest South American mainland, as opposed to species living in the same sort of climate? Why is Australia full of marsupials absent in the rest of the eastern hemisphere, but didn't have any placentals until recently (except those that can fly), unless placentals evolved after Australia split from the other continents?
Why do structures used for completely different purposes in different species appear to have the same basic structure. The leg of a cheetah, the arm of a monkey, the flipper of a dolphin and the wing of a bat are all made out of the same set of bones; the complicated machinery orchids have evolved for pollination, including insect mimics and the like, all seem to be modified petals and other parts that are shred with other plants - what sensible explanation for this is there other than common descent?
Why do whales have vestigial leg bones, and why don't humans have backs that can handle upright living without widespread back complaints?
Of course, you could explain all of these things with divine creation, but then you could explain anything with divine creation. Regardless of the actual nature of reailty, you could always retort that God just wanted it that way, which is why divine creation is such a unsatisfying answer when others exist. It's a 'brain-in-a-jar' argument.
What would you consider evidence for evolution in biology?
Edited by caffeine, : No reason given.
Edited by caffeine, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2