Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,871 Year: 4,128/9,624 Month: 999/974 Week: 326/286 Day: 47/40 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists as Hyperevolutionists?
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 98 (73468)
12-16-2003 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by John Paul
12-16-2003 5:16 PM


quote:
Lindsay and Dawkins have been refuted by Behe.
And Behe has been refuted by the evidence. As soon as you can come up with a viable evolutionary pathway his Irreducible Complexity theorom is shot, of which the eye is one example, the middle ear ossicles another (even better since there is fossil evidence). He also argued that a land mammal to whale transitional fossil would never be found. Six months after this comment one was found. Perhaps you could start a Behe topic and we could all comment there?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by John Paul, posted 12-16-2003 5:16 PM John Paul has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024