Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Creationists as Hyperevolutionists?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists as Hyperevolutionists?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 31 of 98 (73200)
12-15-2003 10:56 PM 		Reply to: Message 29 by John Paul
12-15-2003 9:29 PM

What were the Created Kinds? Science should be able to help us ascertain that.
​
Well, so far science is suggesting that there was only ever one "created" kind - Life. Everything else is just a decendant of that life, within that basic kind.
​
See, simple! You can have your created kinds and evolution, too. Personally I don't see what use a classification system with only one catagory is, though.
​
What is the biological or genetic evidence that shows random mutations culled by natural selection can lead to the range of changes they insist have occured?
​
The observation of these changes occuring in contemporary time.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by John Paul, posted 12-15-2003 9:29 PM John Paul has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by John Paul, posted 12-15-2003 11:17 PM crashfrog has replied
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 98 (73237)
12-16-2003 12:30 AM 		Reply to: Message 32 by John Paul
12-15-2003 11:17 PM

There isn't any evidence to support the alleged "great transformations" required by the ToE.
​
What "great transformations?" There's not a novel biological structure you can name for which we can't find an intermediate step.
​
There aren't any great transformations. There's just step-wise change, adding up over eons.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by John Paul, posted 12-15-2003 11:17 PM John Paul has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by John Paul, posted 12-16-2003 3:27 PM crashfrog has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024