lpetrich writes:
quote:
However, ICR's response is that evolution within a "created kind" or baramin is not really evolution.
And thus this argument is the, say it with me, "No 'True' Scotsman" fallacy.
Basically, they're redefining "evolution" to be "changes across the 'kind/baramin' level" (while being steadfast in their refusal to provide a functional definition of a "kind" or "baramin") and thus any changes below that level are the "microevolution" they have to admit to lest they look like complete idiots.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!
™ Version 4.2