Really cute -I like that fish -but when I look at it, I instinctively know it is a fully functional creation.
Your instinct is irrelevant and you should know better than to rely on so flawed a tool. I for instance, instinctively know that I am the wittiest and most attractive individual in the world, but sadly, the evidence is against me. Forget instinct. It's rubbish at science.
Every creature has to be able to carry out all the various functions...
Are you attempting to argue irreducible complexity for the handfish's fin? It seems a poor candidate for such reasoning, since it's fairly obvious how progressively more "foot-like" fins would convey increasing advantage to a bottom dwelling fish at each stage.
You really have to believe that that kind of thing is possible.
The "science=religion" argument has no place here, even if it weren't fallacious.
One function missing -bye bye fishy.
Very silly comment. I have a fish in my tank called
Botia lohachata. It has no eyes, seemingly no eye sockets even. To be quite clear, the species normally posses eyes. My one is a freak. It does absolutely fine. Even in the wild it would be at little disadvantage, since its home waters are too murky for sight to be of much use anyway.
Mutate and Survive