Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8942 total)
32 online now:
DrJones*, Faith, jar (3 members, 29 visitors)
Newest Member: John Sullivan
Post Volume: Total: 863,722 Year: 18,758/19,786 Month: 1,178/1,705 Week: 430/518 Day: 48/58 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Show one complete lineage in evolution
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1336 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 239 of 246 (144281)
09-23-2004 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Wounded King
07-21-2004 10:09 AM


HYPOCRISY
WK writes:

Saying that there is no 1 single 'complete' fossil lineage doesn't mean that there is no physical evidence of evolution and certainly doesn't mean that scientists are lying. At the worst all it means is that we don't have fossils showing every transitional stage in any 1 evolutionary lineage, so what? Such a fossil lineage still wouldn't be 'proof' to those who object to evolution on religious grounds.

Mangy Tiger writes:

www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=1&t=254&m=237#237 -->www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=1&t=254&m=237#237">http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=1&t=254&m=237#237

Talking solely about the claim that the British Royal Family is descended from King David, there is a break in the supplied lineage and so the claim is refuted.

Mangy Tiger is an evolutionist arguing that the British Royal Crown MUST not contain a single break in the lineage OR the claim is refuted.

Now in this thread you evos assert the opposite.

For the record I side with Wounded King.

Absence in the record or a complete record does not necessarily mean thus and such.

The only issue is macro evolution - one species evolving into another.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Wounded King, posted 07-21-2004 10:09 AM Wounded King has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 240 by MangyTiger, posted 09-23-2004 10:28 PM Cold Foreign Object has responded
 Message 242 by Admin, posted 09-23-2004 10:46 PM Cold Foreign Object has responded
 Message 244 by Loudmouth, posted 09-24-2004 1:01 PM Cold Foreign Object has not yet responded

    
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1336 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 241 of 246 (144303)
09-23-2004 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 240 by MangyTiger
09-23-2004 10:28 PM


Re: HYPOCRISY
In other words you're trying to compare apples and oranges. The lineage of individuals is not the same as the lineage of species.

My accusation of hypocrisy was rhetorical.

You are busted.

You have no integrity.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by MangyTiger, posted 09-23-2004 10:28 PM MangyTiger has not yet responded

    
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1336 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 243 of 246 (144307)
09-23-2004 10:53 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by Admin
09-23-2004 10:46 PM


Re: HYPOCRISY
Admin:

I simply pointed out that a break in a chain in one subject refutes the claim but in another it does not.

If true is this not hypocrisy ?

Is a charge of hypocrisy against the Rules ?

If it is I will not level the charge and notify Admins when someone else does it.

WT

Edit:

If I am being racked for not being nice then I apologize.

This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 09-23-2004 10:07 PM


This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by Admin, posted 09-23-2004 10:46 PM Admin has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019