Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolving Populations, and Speciation
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 8 (286417)
02-14-2006 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Zawi
02-14-2006 9:14 AM


more like the first one
Its more like your first example. Mutations happen all the time and mostly have no affect on reproductive success or any non-negligible affect on the allele frequency of the population. The environmental affects come after the mutations and determine which mutations ”succeed’ or ”fail’.
then that family line will soon dominate the population, until all members of the population posess the mutation
Even if this happened it would not be speciation. Speciation requires a separation from the parent population, either geographically, by some morphological difference that prevents reproduction, or something else. If the mutated population is not separated, but ends up dominating the parent population, then that population has evolved but no speciation has occurred.
An environmental change occurs, 'encouraging' mutations across the population.
Mutations happen all the time, randomly. I think it is possible for the environment to encourage mutation, by nuclear radiation or something, but I don’t think this is something that really promotes speciation.
Over time, the beneficial mutations are pooled together to create new species.
No, some kind of seperation is needed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Zawi, posted 02-14-2006 9:14 AM Zawi has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024