quote:
Originally posted by ksc:
Just for the record:
As of now the evos have not been able to present a reasonable answer as to why the living fossils presented have not changed from the original animal of tens and hundreds of millions of years ago. I have presented just 3 examples as why they should have changed morphologically. You can re-read this thread for examples and explanations of the 3 reasonscand also see where the evo come up short with scientific answers.
The best answer was...they didn't need to change or who said evolution says they have to change.
The evo have had ample of chance to address the issue but have chosen not to.
Instead some have decided to change the topic of the thread.
I think this analogy will validate the answers given.
When you cross a street you can get hit by a bus. If you cross a street 100 million times your chances of getting hit by said bus increase, but not once does the chances of getting hit by a bus increase to 100%. So while there is a chance that the "living fossils" could have mutated, never is there an instance that they HAVE to mutate. I believe this is all covered by basic probability. If I am wrong please tell me why and how, and not with some reply talking about how long they haven't changed.. I've read that same response like 8 times in this thread already.
™ Version 4.2