Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 76 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-21-2019 8:30 PM
23 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, Faith, Theodoric (4 members, 19 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 851,765 Year: 6,802/19,786 Month: 1,343/1,581 Week: 165/393 Day: 98/50 Hour: 7/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is There Any Genetic Or Morphological Criterion For "Kind"?
ggghg7
Junior Member (Idle past 1989 days)
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-08-2011


Message 27 of 40 (643647)
12-09-2011 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Dr Adequate
09-26-2006 8:09 PM


Baraminology
Hello,
Perhaps the most specific reference to baraminology (the creation science version of taxonomy) can be found here: http://objectiveministries.org/creation/baraminology.html

Essentially it does seem like a regurgitation of the biological speces concept, but it's an elegant attempt by 'creation scientists.'


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-26-2006 8:09 PM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Coyote, posted 12-09-2011 9:37 PM ggghg7 has responded
 Message 29 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-09-2011 11:30 PM ggghg7 has not yet responded

  
ggghg7
Junior Member (Idle past 1989 days)
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-08-2011


Message 39 of 40 (644086)
12-14-2011 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Coyote
12-09-2011 9:37 PM


Re: Baraminology
Science can't validate supernatural causes that apologetics refer to. I think the point of the thread in establishing the fact that there is no religious criterion for a "kind" is clear.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Coyote, posted 12-09-2011 9:37 PM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019