Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   context and how to ignore it to make it appear as though...
derwood
Member (Idle past 1876 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 1 of 2 (25067)
11-30-2002 2:27 PM


... you actually 'proved' something.
In the now closed thread, I had written:
"Never mind that he [Borger] has claimed - and been unable to support (because there IS NO support) - that conserved sequences in introns falsifies the neutral theory."
The cretinist in question responded with:
quote:
I say:
Wanna have proof? Take a subscribtion to JBC:
WBlanc V, Davidson NO. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
C to U RNA editing: Mechanisms leading to genetic diversity.
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 20 [epub ahead of print]
PMID: 12446660 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
The autors show that RNA editing requires intron-exon alignment and that implicates conserved regions in the intron. Case proven.
I ask the rational reader - Did the creationist prove that conserved sequence in introns - which I mentioned some time ago - falsifies the Neutral Theory with his citation?
Or was the creationist's response utterly irrelevant, as it seems to me?
[This message has been edited by SLPx, 11-30-2002]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Mammuthus, posted 12-02-2002 4:08 AM derwood has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024