The adaptation"" that was missed MIGHT indeed have been noticed in point of fact by Aggaiz when he related softshell turtles to tortises. I have indeed been able to sythesize my own thought on Galelio not to NUMBERS OF INDIVIDUALS (which is what I was thinking of when I first wrote that this) (which would be caluculated from any switch in the levels via Wright (no matter the potential)) but to water content ON THE SUPRAMOLEUCLAR STANDARD. There are other population genetic possibilites however. I am uncertain if I should introduce a non standard mathematical way of assesing the equilibrium of gene flow or if I should just try to use current numerical techinques. Some of the difficulty involves trying to get a correlation without biasing the causality of gravity in all of it. But I guess that would come first no matter what the seperation of the spontaneous from the nonsponteous IS (were). Regardless this results in an oversight of form-making by not isolating the secondary characters subject NOT TO MENDELIAN ERROR but only biochemical variance( a difficlut point I will likely need some more time to rethink how to reexpress it more clearly). A tunicate and a seed are not the same creature but the equilbrium has the same possible intersection of temporal and structural hierarhices just so.
Fisher was granting this point to Wright and I am fairly sure that I have been able to recover the same as my Grandfather studied with Zelensky as did Wright. Wright is not all that hard to follow we are just not educated to think as he did. Agassiz thought of domestic creatures simply to show that they may have been the same species as in the wild but Mendel showed the SPACE of this not the TIME. Wright was able to realize the mutation part but the migration which space and time give (biogeographicalllly) has yet to be worked up in limit of the physical agent process that the Earth itself systematizes no matter mans moral or intellecutal progress. Perceiveing such a standard for agriculture is one thing but making the thought which involves a switch between algebra and geometry clear is exceeding difficult within the clarity of a phenomenology. It was inexcusible that Barbra McClintock's work took so long to get recognized. This rethiniknig of the difference of topobiology and neophenogensis in terms of instructed chemical mixtures and not simply compounds is a hard task. The Lambda symbol in calculations being zero for hydrocarbons seems to contain the morphological extent of the the Radiata of Aggaisz and I venture rahter shakly to porpose that verts are parmagnetic compared with diamagnetic echinoderms etc where I trend on my thin physics KNOWLEDGE. I said something like this on Wolfram's site but they are not programmed to consider that it would be a mistake to think of a magnetic shell from an electon orbit. These could be two things biologically but only one physicochemically. It requires a determined relation of levels of organization and levels of selection which we dont have as (of) yet.
™ Version 4.2
