Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Macro" vs "Micro" genetic "kind" mechanism?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 137 of 248 (255170)
10-27-2005 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Cold Foreign Object
10-27-2005 4:37 PM


Darwinists claim all species are transitional since there is no actual evidence linking them.
Incorrect. Evolutionists observe that all populations undergo change, none are static; thus, all species are in a state of transition.
It's an observation, not a claim. And it's certainly not based on a lack of evidence as you falsely claim.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-27-2005 4:37 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-27-2005 11:59 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 146 of 248 (255287)
10-28-2005 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Cold Foreign Object
10-27-2005 11:59 PM


I happen to know you are probably the most knowledgeable evolutionist anyone will find anywhere.
That's certainly false.
But with all due respect these are weasel words.
No, they're not. The only thing remotely "weaselish" here is your attempt to squirm out from beneath your demonstratably false and dishonest claims.
You briefly cite general well known CLAIMS.
No, I cite observations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-27-2005 11:59 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 161 of 248 (255498)
10-29-2005 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by Cold Foreign Object
10-29-2005 3:15 PM


Re: Macro Evolution - a definition?
In my forth-coming Internet article titled "Darwinism Refuted" to be posted on a large Creationist website (due late December) I define macroevolution:
Backing-up this invulnerable definition I then reference Richard Milton:
Then I reference Dr. Michael Behe:
This is a taste of the article we're supposed to anticipate with bated breath? Just creationists cutting and pasting each other. There really is no original thought among your kind, Herp. Even in the scant few instances that you people provide something approaching physical evidence, it's something that you had to rip off from real scientists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-29-2005 3:15 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024