Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Definition for the Theory of Evolution
AdminPaul
Inactive Member


Message 131 of 216 (413482)
07-31-2007 3:04 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by IamJoseph
07-31-2007 3:01 AM


OFF TOPIC WARNING
You're heading for another suspension. Stick to the definitions, and leave your arguments about evolution out of it. And try to phrase them in meaningful English instead of your own personal jargon in future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2007 3:01 AM IamJoseph has not replied

AdminPaul
Inactive Member


Message 141 of 216 (413502)
07-31-2007 7:08 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by IamJoseph
07-31-2007 7:06 AM


END IT HERE
Modulous is right. This discussion is off-topic here.
Please find a relevant topic or propose a new one, per the forum rules. Anyone who continues this diversion will be suspended.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2007 7:06 AM IamJoseph has not replied

AdminPaul
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 216 (413530)
07-31-2007 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by IamJoseph
07-31-2007 10:00 AM


Re: irrelevant
Extensions to the theory are only relevant to this topic in so far as they affect the definition. There is no "narrow knife-edge protrayal".
Does your question refer to an observed phenomenon that is relevant to the definition ? If so you need to explain it in terms that can be understood by people other than yourself. If not, it should be considered off-topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2007 10:00 AM IamJoseph has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024