[QUOTE]Originally posted by SLPx:
Better yet, since it is your claim that 'non-random mutations' exist and falsify NDT, and that this 'information' is pre-existing in the genome, maybe you can present some genetic analyses that demonstrate that some gene that is needed for survival but is not active exists in multicellular eukaryotes (provide the sequence of the genome), expose this multicellular eukaryote to some stressor, then demonstrate that the gene needed - and only the gene needed (i.e., not genome wide) is activated via a specific mutation.
Syrely you can do this, since you claim to have falsified NDT.
Your simplistic defintion of 'random' seems awfully out of place.
[/B][/QUOTE]
Wouldn't the GLO pseudogene be a prime candidate for such a demonstration? There is strong evidence that it would be a fully functional gene with a few correcting mutations. Individuals can be stressed by removing dietary sources of vitamin C.
Where is the evidence that such protein directed mutations have occurred? Are these only mutations within somatic cells or do they also occur in gamete cells?
BTW, where is the evidence that members of nomadic tribes have functional GLO genes?