Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,789 Year: 4,046/9,624 Month: 917/974 Week: 244/286 Day: 5/46 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Evolution and the BIG LIE

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution and the BIG LIE
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5017 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 23 of 108 (441356)
12-17-2007 8:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 18 by Beretta
12-17-2007 5:01 AM

Re: Time
Beretta writes:
​
Darwinian evolution requires far more than the deformed molecules of mutation to explain the origin of new organs and body plans -it needs beneficial changes in anatomy.
​
You haven't, I assume, noticed that all amphibians, reptiles, dinosaurs, birds and mammals are tetrapods? The reason? Common heritage.
​
Tetrapods
​
Beretta writes:
​
There is no proof that this is genetically possible.
​
You're in total denial. There is convergence of evidence across fields such as geology, paleontology, biogeography, comparative anatomy and physiology, molecular biology, genetics, and many others.
​
Transitional sequences.
List of Transitionals
This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Beretta, posted 12-17-2007 5:01 AM Beretta has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Beretta, posted 12-17-2007 9:14 AM RickJB has replied
  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5017 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 25 of 108 (441365)
12-17-2007 9:57 AM 		Reply to: Message 24 by Beretta
12-17-2007 9:14 AM

Re: Time
Beretta writes:
​
I used to believe in evolution -I don't any more -it doesn't make any sense in the light of the evidence against it.
​
Show me a single competing model that similarly attempts to explain the diversity of life on the planet.
​
ID? No, because it is nothing but ill-informed ToE criticism. It has no model. There is no ID theory. There is no attempt to identify either the "design" process or the "designer". ID explains nothing.
​
Beretta writes:
​
Besides why is the other side of everything against evolution kept out of the textbooks with such dedication -if there's nothing to fear from the evidence then let the opposing evidence be taught.
​
Such as what? What other theory is there, besides "Godidit"?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Beretta, posted 12-17-2007 9:14 AM Beretta has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024