I've noted the post in my calendar ramoss. I don't think you have to worry about where it will be published. Since the author has demonstrated a difficulty with the use of firm evidence and logic it is not likely to be "published" anywhere.
This is the same guy who when a map and the great pyramid are refered to jumps to the height of the pyramid as if that is an answer to the map referring. This is the same guy who doesn't get it when it is pointed out how the height measurements are flawed. I don't think we have to be getting excited about any major step forward in science appearing April.
In fact, I suspect that come the merry month of May there will be no "paper" at all. There might be an incoherent mess that has already been discussed and blown to bits here but nothing new.