I'm a bit out of touch with the evolutionary biology that can combat creationist arguments head-on; I'm much better at simply analyizng the straegy and discussing how it works (hence, I was not a bad "creation apologist" for a time, myself).
Here's an interesting quote from Chapter 7, part 1:
"Arranging the skulls of these extinct apes from the smallest to the biggest, and adding some skulls of VANISHED HUMAN RACES to the series, evolutionists conconcted the scenario of human evolution."
Here it is again:
"...fossils that are included by evolutionists under imaginary classifications such as homo erectur, hom ergaster, or homo spaiens archaic, in fact belong to DIFFERENT HUMAN RACES."
And in case you didn't catch that...
"When these fossils are inspected, in is seen that their skeletons are essentially the same as people living today. The only dissimilarities are a few structural differences in the skulls... [creepy music] but differences like these are to be found in DIFFERENT HUMAN RACES living today."
OK, this is wacky. They're really in direct disagreement with Answers in Genesis, which steadfastly (and, be it noted, correctly) that there is precisely one race of human beings. I'm certain that you can't detect differences between skulls of human ethnic groups (read Steven Jay Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man"). The film could have picked up a bit in noting that the variation within each particular human race was more substantial than the differences between the so-called "races," but they simply maintain this false classification of their own, and tack on a deceptive paraphrase from Richard Leakey (I don't know for certain, but I would strongly expect him to have put forth similar views to Gould about the structures of human skulls). On further searching, I note that the film fails to mention the fact that Leakey is no longer active in field work, but has taken some bold political steps for political equality and justice in Kenya.
So, back to the tomfoolery, was homo erectus a black man or a white? Asian? Aboriginal? Was homo ergaster ne of that rare breed of "vato-niggaz from da 'hood?"
Answers in Genesis also maintains, notably, that there has been no evolution of the human "kind" (why not?), so they stake themselves on these fossils being extinct apes or completely human. I wonder where this film gets its endorsement...