Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9057 total)
251 online now:
Aussie, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, vimesey (6 members, 245 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,866 Year: 978/6,534 Month: 978/682 Week: 31/182 Day: 5/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do you define the word Evolution?
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 97 of 936 (804084)
04-07-2017 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by bkelly
11-14-2005 4:10 PM


I define evolution in three words, not 90.

"OP stated "I ask that all definitions be less than 90 words in total. Keep it short, clear, and to the point. No justifications, no rationales, no references. Don’t go look it up then write what you read in your own words. Just post your concise opinion. Note that for reference, this paragraph, including these last sentences, contains 90 words as counted by Microsoft Word. I have added a little extra BS just to get this close to the exact value so we will have an easy reference. Three more words.""

Luck and Chance

All evolution comes down to luck and chance, magical beneficial mutations.

My definition of evolution is "LUCK and CHANCE"


.
Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.

The Lord created science and all things. Laws did not create themselves. Nothing happened by chance and accident.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bkelly, posted 11-14-2005 4:10 PM bkelly has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Coyote, posted 04-07-2017 10:25 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 99 by herebedragons, posted 04-07-2017 10:57 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 101 by Tangle, posted 04-07-2017 11:02 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 102 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-07-2017 11:08 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 103 by Diomedes, posted 04-07-2017 1:26 PM Davidjay has responded
 Message 107 by CRR, posted 04-10-2017 5:45 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 104 of 936 (804332)
04-08-2017 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by Diomedes
04-07-2017 1:26 PM


Thanks for the pic, HEREbedragons.

But lets narrow down the words even further and be more precise.

ONE WORD

LUCK

for luck and chance are basically the same. Lucky mutations, and lucky selections. Keep rolling the dice, evolutionists hoping in true faith for a better outcome to your theory and sadly to your lives.
But theres still time to push away from the table before you are absolutely broke.

Evolution can be summed up in one word .. LUCK


.
Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.

The Lord created science and all things. Laws did not create themselves. Nothing happened by chance and accident.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Diomedes, posted 04-07-2017 1:26 PM Diomedes has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-08-2017 10:14 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 109 of 936 (804557)
04-11-2017 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by Pressie
04-10-2017 6:49 AM


Re: Luck & Chance
The basis of luck and chance is luck.

Nothing stimulates mutations. These supposed magical mutations or explosions or mis-reads or new combinations do not appear because of a need for them, or because the species thought them up as an improvement, they supposedly only arrive by sheer luck and chance.

So evolutionists knowing this and admitting this whole basis of luck on their beloved mutations, try to suggest, its the lucky envirorment that magically selects these mistakes and abberations, or misreads that then produce the magic result. As if a lucky mutation gets even luckier when its compounded by a lucky envirorment.

And if it doesnt succeed in the short term, or the life span of that living organism, then they say, try, try again, as it is bound to get lucky if given enough lucky years. Lets say a million or billion years of lucky misrereads and waiting for the right selection process in the right lucky conditions.

Yes, I would definitely say Evolution can be summarized or defined as 'LUCK'. Luck waiting for the right chance.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Pressie, posted 04-10-2017 6:49 AM Pressie has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by vimesey, posted 04-11-2017 7:33 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 111 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-11-2017 8:28 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 141 by CRR, posted 04-12-2017 6:52 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 112 of 936 (804586)
04-11-2017 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by vimesey
04-11-2017 7:33 AM


Re: Luck & Chance
Yes, bad mutations and misreads happen, but where are your beneficial mutations.

Why is the original still with us. Where is the advantage of two heads ? Where is the advantage of radioactive mutations, bringing on better normal organisms and animals.

There is no such thing as a beneficial mutation that luckily just mutated in time to magically improve a species ? Do answer

Evolution is straight out luck and chance, whether one goes to the local gambling casino or one out of state. Magical selection in the envirorment does not change the luck of evolutionary gambling. Its LUCK


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by vimesey, posted 04-11-2017 7:33 AM vimesey has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-11-2017 12:42 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 117 by Diomedes, posted 04-11-2017 1:26 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 118 by Tangle, posted 04-11-2017 5:53 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 113 of 936 (804587)
04-11-2017 11:32 AM


Nature ran a lottery ????
Good comparison, Nature ran a lottery and eventually if given enough time, a KIND should mutate and hit the jackpot is their total motivation and ploy and con. It keeps evolutionists gambling and sitting at their mindless tables, wasting their lives away.

Meanwhile real scientists are working and studying and finding principles and laws and marveling at how all things fit together perfectly and EXACTLY.

Jesus wins, evolutionists are mere gamblers, gambling away their lives, hoping in Mother Nature Providence to deliver them.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by ringo, posted 04-11-2017 11:58 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 115 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-11-2017 12:40 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 130 of 936 (804663)
04-12-2017 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by ringo
04-11-2017 11:58 AM


Re: Nature ran a lottery ????
Sure... I can name real Christian Scientists who discovered the laws of our Creator..

(from http://whychristianity.com)

Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)

Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going
around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His
new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and
Copernicus was urged to publish around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution -
and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George
Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the
Bible.

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)

Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of
planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well
before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern
direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about
how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the
sun-centred system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600)
when other Protestants had been expelled!

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar
system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centred system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not
indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits
of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favourite
argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended.
After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centred system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work,
which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, he saw his system as concerning the issue
of how the Bible should be interpreted.

Rene Descartes (1596-1650)

Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern
philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a
Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age
of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His
system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I
am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the
existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences can we trust
our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted
was to see his philosophy adopted as standard Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are
generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God
was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)

In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science
(including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly
religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding from the Bible God's plan for history. He did a lot of work
on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology very important. In
his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most
beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent
and powerful Being."

Robert Boyle (1791-1867)

One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gasses,
and also wrote an important work on chemistry. The Encyclopaedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he
endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, "for proving the Christian religion against
notorious infidels."... As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion
abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his
theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious
duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was
clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.

Michael Faraday (1791-1867)

The son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and
magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but has led to so much in our lifestyles today which depend on them
(including computers and telephone lines and so Web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the
Sandemanians, which significantly influenced upon him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and
interpreted nature. The Sandemanians originated from Presbyterians who had rejected the idea of state churches, and
tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

(From http://whychristianity.com)

Michael Faraday (1791-1867)

The son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity
and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but has led to so much in our lifestyles today which depend on
them (including computers and telephone lines and so Web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of
the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced upon him and strongly affected the way in which he
approached and interpreted nature. The Sandemanians originated from Presbyterians who had rejected the idea of
state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)

Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism".
He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the
Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained
comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar
results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the
1860's was the formation of the X-Club, dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of
"conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific
interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He
was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science whilst, at around the same time, an Austrian
monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect
Galton's contribution.

Kelvin (William Thompson) (1824-1907)

Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern
physics. His work covered may areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than
anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities
who recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, certainly more religious than the
average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk
Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal,
apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopaedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists
as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir
Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth
creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an
upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about
radiogenic heating).

Max Planck (1858-1947)

Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which has revolutionized
our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft,"
Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible
Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are
merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing,
beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against
scepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated
with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2).
Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe.
The Encyclopaedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's
God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he
once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or
that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."
Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a
real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame,
religion without science is blind."
(end of small excerpt)

Can you name one intelligent evolutionist ? who has discovered any truth ? rather than those confirming evolutionary theory for research grants ?

Jesus wins, real scientists win, evolutionists lose again.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by ringo, posted 04-11-2017 11:58 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Pressie, posted 04-12-2017 5:52 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 135 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-12-2017 9:32 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 138 by ringo, posted 04-12-2017 3:45 PM Davidjay has responded
 Message 143 by NoNukes, posted 04-12-2017 11:09 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 131 of 936 (804664)
04-12-2017 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Theodoric
04-11-2017 11:29 PM


Wake up Theodore..

You have been lied to and pass on the BIG LIE.

""""God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness."""

The truth is you excuse everything and make mistakes and mutations as your supposed creator, saying evolution did it, and then worship it or him or her, without question because it is your religion despite the facts. You have zero credibility except with the intimidated and the lazy and sloughful. Real scientists discover truths rather than maybe , should haves, might have fallcies. Evolution is the BIG LIE

http://www.davidjayjordan.com/EvolutionisaBIGLIE.html

Jesus wins Theodore, and you lose until you pick the winner and the truth.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Theodoric, posted 04-11-2017 11:29 PM Theodoric has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Theodoric, posted 04-12-2017 7:59 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 136 of 936 (804701)
04-12-2017 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by Dr Adequate
04-12-2017 9:32 AM


Re: Nobel Prize winners ????
Nobel was a war merchant, who started a Peace prize !!! ?????

Its winners are usually losers.

Did not Obama get a peace prize for continuing in more and more wars ?

Evolutionists winning a peace prize or any prize had to be by luck and chance ... or pure folly.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-12-2017 9:32 AM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-12-2017 12:18 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 144 of 936 (804737)
04-13-2017 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by ringo
04-12-2017 3:45 PM


Re: Evolutions have discovered no new laws.. NONE
Name any evolutionists that has discovered any law or new law, or anything that has helped mankind.

Mine were great famous Christian Scientists, you have none. But go ahead name some and tell us what laws they advanced.

Jesus is the Great Scientist, Mathematician and Creator, not dumb luck and chance evolutionists.

But thanks for admitting I meet your challenge and won... won again.

Much appreciated


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by ringo, posted 04-12-2017 3:45 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Davidjay, posted 04-13-2017 12:29 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 146 by Coyote, posted 04-13-2017 12:34 AM Davidjay has responded
 Message 150 by Dredge, posted 04-13-2017 3:02 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 159 by ringo, posted 04-13-2017 11:44 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 145 of 936 (804738)
04-13-2017 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by Davidjay
04-13-2017 12:21 AM


Re: Jacobs sheep coloring is not evolution or mutation
Yes Jacob learned his lesson and stopped being a con artist and a trickster. And had to serve under a greater liar and trickster than himself. Jacobs evil father in law... employer . .. wouldnt pay for his weeks service. (Week equalling seven years) so Jacob made a deal with him for all the so called blemished sheep, and then used his knowledge of direct on the field experience to change colour of newborns. Thats not a mutation, thats a color change, an external
physical trait like our racial colours and yet we remain brothers and the same KIND. ((Evolution is such a racist doctrine anyway)

Stupid evolutionists also get so desperate to think dogs mutate when manipulative humans inbreed them for certain variable traits creating new (ever so weak) breeds of new dogs. Again absolutely not mutational change just inbreeding. Evolutionists do not know genetics and never have shown any hope of learning some. Why because they are so desperate to find one piece of evidence concerning a beneficial mutational change.

Anyway, read the story of Jacob and the blemished sheep

Mandrakes is a very interesting subject..... Ha, but its only for the mature.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Davidjay, posted 04-13-2017 12:21 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 147 of 936 (804742)
04-13-2017 12:47 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by Coyote
04-13-2017 12:34 AM


Re: Evolutions have discovered no new laws.. NONE
Yes, evolution is not provable.

Evolution and evolutionary scientists have discovered no new laws.

Agreed evolution has no mathematical basis.

Yes evolution did not create any laws, nor did any law evolve from another law.

Yes the laws of thermodynamics absolutely refute the foolishness and unscientific theory and fantasy of evolution.

Remember Issac Newton was a CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST.

Christ wins again, evolutionists lose again.

Coyote you have to get some rest, I told you chasing that road runner, was going to be the end of you. You just aren't fast enough and smart enough. And you cant wait for a billion years for some beneficial mutations to make you faster and smarter.

Agreed ?


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Coyote, posted 04-13-2017 12:34 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 152 of 936 (804807)
04-13-2017 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by caffeine
04-12-2017 5:20 PM


Variations are not mutations. Dog breeds vary because of variations and inbreeding, manipulation.

Variation in humans is by the Lord for diversity etc.... it in no way means mutational change.

STOP twisting words, to suit your theory. STOP the double speak.

First there was the useage of the word, INNATE, as if they just happened to come into existence before evolution and now, variation.

Evolutionists are so desperate, but as mentioned are not scientists but double speak linguists, who graduated in liberal arts, very liberal...ready for the world of science fiction literature.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by caffeine, posted 04-12-2017 5:20 PM caffeine has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-13-2017 10:18 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 232 by caffeine, posted 04-16-2017 11:13 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 158 of 936 (804834)
04-13-2017 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by Dr Adequate
04-13-2017 10:24 AM


Re: Luck & Chance
Yes, agreed, me and evolutionists seem to all agree evolution is by pure luck and chance.

And Yes, the creationist quote, rings true and honest and scientific, Lets repeat it for the advancement of true science..""This theory (evolution) has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless".
- (the late) Professor Louis Bouroune, former President of the Biological Society of Stras.....

IE evolution or luck and chance has not helped the advancement of science one iota, I mean how can unintelligent luck and chance prove beneficial to anything, let alone true science.

Creationism and intelligence wins again.

PS Dr. Adequate, do learn to write more than one liners otherwise your one sentence responses will surely be deemed inadequate.
Just a suggestion

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-13-2017 10:24 AM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-13-2017 11:49 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 161 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-13-2017 11:57 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 162 by Diomedes, posted 04-13-2017 3:33 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 165 by Dredge, posted 04-13-2017 8:24 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 183 of 936 (804943)
04-14-2017 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by Dr Adequate
04-14-2017 11:35 AM


Re: Tricky definitions.
Amazing Dr. Adequate, made a post of more than one sentence.

I dont agree with it, but am encouraged that she is trying to answer FAITH, and actually must have studied the indocrination and forced theory of evolution.

But lets get back to definitions...... rather than math and facts. Definitions are linguistic, but sometimes they do set boundaries if agreed upon. The problem being, linquistic Bachelor of Arts evolutionists tend to switch definitions, or evolve their definitions, to try and incorporate truths or narrow truths or big lies in narrow definitions, so they in time can say they actually have truths. Its a slippery road they hoe and use, so the definition of evolution has to be concrete and solid and accepted by all. No one has differed that evolution is by CHANCE so I say its accepted definition by all, is LUCK or if you like CHANCE


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-14-2017 11:35 AM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-14-2017 11:52 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 185 by JonF, posted 04-14-2017 12:07 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 275 of 936 (805300)
04-17-2017 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 274 by CRR
04-17-2017 7:01 AM


Re: Desperate evolutionists desperately need proof
CCR, amazing that after all these years, evolutionists are trying to say that the Lords' variability, in genetics, is a sign or proof of evolution.

I heard about these dark moths adapting for survival maybe twenty years ago.... or was it thrity years ago, before becoming a full time missionary...and that dementia of evolutionists is still being touted as a proof of evolution. Give us a scientific break.

Desperate evolutionists will twist anything. Chaleleons change colour via their oringial design, all sorts of animals are given the ability to blend into their environment, (Which came first the flounders eyes on only one side or their method of hiding in the sand at the bottom.... The Lord created them in one go, they did not evolve by shifting their eyes to one side, they didn;t evolve their colours, they were GIVEN.

Moths that get darker, are still moths. Color is not an evolution. Races are not different because of their color. They are ALL people, all human.


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by CRR, posted 04-17-2017 7:01 AM CRR has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by Genomicus, posted 04-17-2017 12:07 PM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 326 by Dredge, posted 04-20-2017 2:05 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022