Flies and birds share flight-specific gene use

Dear Tranquility Base
With this example you provided just another falsification of evolution theory.
Fact is that the theory has fallen. However, evolutionists claim that there is no alternative (although this is not true), so they have to stick to this -- over and over falsified -- hypothesis.
Fact is that if you write an article that is not in accord with their theory they will reject it, so it will not be published in their peer reviewed journals and so they keep the wall up. (See: the discussion of Dr. Max with Dr. Spetner on the true-origin homepage).
In the meantime they brainwash the rest of the world with their simplistic vision of life.
But, what did you expect from a religion? All they do is the dispersion of another "meme" (word invented by Dawkins himself). Did you notice that they have a "Darwin Day" to worhip him (see: UTK website), and Dawkins proposed to chair the ceromony? Pathetic!
I've sent the organising commity an email with all the scientific facts that summarise the fall of Darwin's theory, but, of course, they didn't like to respond to it. (See my posting for the 4 arguments that summarise the fall of the theory.) Your example further falsifies common descent. And no evolutionist is able to reconcile this gene with the species tree.
I invite them to give a scientific explanation. Convergence is nothing but a word.
Best wishes
Peter

Dear Andya,
Thanks for your response. I am working and thinking a lot on a scientific alternative and I think I am able to present an alternative. Of course it has to be peer reviewed. All I am doing now is figuring out whether my examples can be rebutted. Next, it has to be validated by scientific approach. Await the theory (any contributions are welcome), which of course will not inlude the origin of life, since that matter cannot be addressed by science (due to genetic uncertainty). I hope that a lot of ideas will be spawned.
Peter